April 08, 2007
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:47 AM
| Comments (51)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
Drat, it ate my first comment.
I think there's something ownky with the post status pulldown. I saved a post as "draft", and when I came back, the "publish" at the top of the stauts pulldown lisy had been over written by "draft." So I tried changing to "published" to see if that would do anything. All it did was replace the first item in the lest with "published" and the post still doesn't appear.
Posted by: Will at April 10, 2007 05:40 PM (SOx9v)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at April 10, 2007 05:43 PM (PiXy!)
Stupid newbie question: What controls the "more" tag. When I wrote this three-sentence post, I'm sure I didn't go anywhere near the "more" window, yet there it is. (Yet in the previous post it's not there.
Also reporting that the WYSIWYG post editor seems to work fine in both K-Meleon 0.9 on Windows 98 and K-Meleon 1.02 on Windows XP.
Posted by: Old Grouch at April 12, 2007 07:37 PM (FZKGS)
Posted by: Old Grouch at April 12, 2007 07:38 PM (FZKGS)
What's Windows 98?
Dunno if there is a paragraph tag or not, but you didn't have a closing tag, so it wouldn't have worked no matter what.
You might have screwed up your post template, which caused the conditional to fail...
Posted by: McGurk at April 12, 2007 08:18 PM (Ri74D)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at April 13, 2007 01:09 AM (PiXy!)
Since the issue "lack of preview sucks" has already been thoroughly aired, I'll not be bringing it up again :-)
Posted by: Old Grouch at April 13, 2007 03:04 AM (dt7YR)
Posted by: Old Grouch at April 13, 2007 03:07 AM (dt7YR)
, as you've discovered.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at April 13, 2007 03:21 AM (PiXy!)
Posted by: McGurk at April 13, 2007 04:06 AM (8GzzQ)
Posted by: McGurk at April 13, 2007 04:07 AM (8GzzQ)
Posted by: Old Grouch at April 13, 2007 04:18 AM (+E8+c)
Posted by: McGurk at April 13, 2007 04:41 AM (8GzzQ)
AIUI, there is still a ton of legacy FoxPro stuff out there... not so much Clipper anymore. I've been looking at what it'd take to replicate things with newer stuff, but first impression is that the limitations of real SQL are a pain.
Yeah, I know it's fragile. Needless to say, everything is imaged and we keep two offsite backups, one in a different time zone. Anything happen bad enough to knock 'em all out, we'll probably be OB anyway.
Posted by: Old Grouch at April 13, 2007 04:56 AM (+E8+c)
Limitations of real sql? Dude, you're living in a sandbox, commenting on the limitations of the playground. Foxpro is a shitty version of Access. Access is a shitty version of an application + Sql Server. I may be wrong, but I believe MS developed Access in response to Foxpro, and that MS eventually bought Foxpro in order to get its client base. Let's see: foxpro or maybe fox_pro (wikipedia links).
Anyhow, all Fox and Access are is a VBA (visual basic for applications) development environment/execution engine pasted on the front of a database engine. Anything you can build in Fox/Access you can build an equivalent system with VB6 with a Sql database. And that technology's ancient.
Posted by: McGurk at April 13, 2007 01:51 PM (Ri74D)
Posted by: CJUSA at April 17, 2007 06:21 PM (9KqcB)
Posted by: Michael Rittenhouse at April 20, 2007 11:12 AM (kowQC)
There is a problem with the editor, and sometimes it doesn't show images, but they work when you post it. If it's not working in the post either, that's something else.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at April 20, 2007 11:53 AM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Michael Rittenhouse at April 20, 2007 12:39 PM (md6XX)
This is the problem:
">" border="0" alt="http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w70/michaelrittenhouse/DSCN9919.jpg" />
Get rid of those img thingies and you're good.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at April 20, 2007 12:42 PM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at April 20, 2007 12:43 PM (PiXy!)
Posted by: RocketJones at April 20, 2007 04:55 PM (blNMI)
There were an amazing number of applications being written in XBase back then. When I was doing radio (c.a. 1985) I used a Clipper-compiled music scheduling program that ran on whatever Dell was current (amber screen!). It was pretty sophisticated: You tagged each song with characteristics (some were scaled, like "intensity", others were just flags like "male vocal." Then you gave it some rules and the program would block out the hours for you.
Of course that was long before CDDB, so we had to enter all the data ourselves.
Posted by: Old Grouch at April 20, 2007 09:54 PM (VUYEY)
Posted by: ShannenChan at April 23, 2007 05:59 PM (1mEPy)
I wrote a few posts and saved them as drafts and now I can't bring them up to publish them/edit them. It was working fine yesterday.
Also can we get an auto-save for posts or an idiot-warning like a pop up saying "Are you sure you want to leave with out saving?" for entries?
-Mookie
Posted by: Mookie at April 23, 2007 06:02 PM (qfk0K)
I wrote a few posts and saved them as drafts and now I can't bring them up to publish them/edit them. It was working fine yesterday.Whoops! They should be back now.
Also can we get an auto-save for posts or an idiot-warning like a pop up saying "Are you sure you want to leave with out saving?" for entries?I'll look into that.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at April 23, 2007 06:17 PM (PiXy!)
The links on my posts are randomly not working. Originally they all worked, but now some of them have stopped.Which blog is yours, ShannenChan? Oh, hang on, found it. Let me take a look.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at April 23, 2007 06:23 PM (PiXy!)
They didn't stop working at the same time either, originally it was one or two smilies then it just kept spreading. Is there anything I can do to fix it?Found it! You have a :/ smilie, and that is bad news to links in your posts, because it messes up the http://. I suggest you replace it with :shrug: or something like that.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at April 23, 2007 06:40 PM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at April 23, 2007 06:42 PM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at April 23, 2007 06:51 PM (PiXy!)
Posted by: ShannenChan at April 23, 2007 07:10 PM (1mEPy)
Posted by: Old Grouch at May 05, 2007 05:58 PM (+oXoV)
All the browsers I know of do a poor job at resizing images; they all use simple nearest-neighbour algorithms for the processing. The resize function in Minx uses soft anti-aliasing, which produces much better results but takes much more CPU time.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 06, 2007 04:42 PM (PiXy!)
"...which produces much better results but takes much more CPU time."But only has to be done ONCE, so think of all the energy we're saving!
Gee, I'm feeling green already LOL!
Posted by: Old Grouch at May 07, 2007 12:01 AM (qbFAY)
But that's probably why browsers don't do it - on an older PC, the extra time taken to render a page with a large number of resized images could be quite noticeable.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 07, 2007 02:31 AM (PiXy!)
This screwed the formatting in this comment, and I've now posted a clean example here.
When I check the page source, I see that BBCode is outputting <small> when it sees {/small}. This means font size reduction doesn't clear. (Works correctly if you use {sm}{/sm} tags.)
On my browser (at this moment) the unclosed <small> tag makes it render everything after the broken comment on the help page in small font-- even when the comments are hidden, and including the sidebar. I posted the comment almost a week ago, and since there hasn't been any subsequent screaming I'm assuming that I'm the only one seeing this. I'll have a screenshot added to the test post shortly.
Posted by: Old Grouch at May 19, 2007 03:49 PM (TTce3)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 20, 2007 02:29 AM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 21, 2007 04:39 AM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Old Grouch at May 21, 2007 03:46 PM (bvmTR)
I selected "Page" from the dropdown (instead of post) and it seems to have not generated a post, or generated it is such a way that I don't know how to get to it.
Also, what do the dates in that area control? Are they able to be changed (like the path field), or are they auto-populated and useless to try to change? I tried changing the "Start Date" and "End Date" fields assuming they controlled the life of the post, but when I reloaded the post they were reset to previous values.
Posted by: Mob at June 15, 2007 03:35 PM (f+cPk)
Pages are what you use when you want to create an entry that doesn't appear in the main flow of your blog, like an "about" page.
The start and end dates don't work just yet, sorry about that. I should take them out until they do work.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 15, 2007 03:38 PM (PiXy!)
The system seems to be intended for folks that have a bit of experience with creating blogs, so I apologize for the novice questions.
Posted by: Mob at June 15, 2007 03:46 PM (f+cPk)
Is there a way to access the pages you've created? They aren't listed in the posts list, and I can't seem find them anywhere else. I assume once I can get to them I can link them as I would any other page on the internet.Um. Oops. I'll fix that.
The system seems to be intended for folks that have a bit of experience with creating blogs, so I apologize for the novice questions.Novice questions are great, because there are a lot more novices around than experts, and the questions tell me where I need to do more work on the user interface and documentation.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 15, 2007 03:59 PM (PiXy!)
Duplicate post names: If you create multiple posts with the same name, the time/date link in the "Posted by:" message (and external links to the post) will only ever take you to the newest of the posts that share the same name. I noticed that the "path" field can be used to circumvent this, however, this is less than obvious, especially to novices.
Perhaps an addition of a numeral to the end of the path for duplicates (the check for duplicates may be processor intensive, especially on large blogs) or an addition of the timecode to the second placed after the name of the post as default path. (newpost_061507122223) This would allow for unique post names, but not lose the easy sight recognition by post name.
Posted by: Mob at June 15, 2007 04:30 PM (f+cPk)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 15, 2007 04:34 PM (PiXy!)
Still having problems with the post date change option.
What I did:
Had a post that I started on 7/7, but wasn't able to finish, so saved as "Draft." Wrote and published several later posts.
Came back to the draft today, and finished it. Saved text changes as draft, then reopened, changed menu to "publish", clicked options, changed date to today's date and current GMT by editing the existing entry. Clicked elsewhere to get cursor out of the time/date box. Clicked "Save".
Result: post was published, but with the original date, and in the original order, that is below all the subsequent posts. My error?
Posted by: Old Grouch at July 14, 2007 07:15 PM (VUYEY)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at July 15, 2007 03:19 AM (PiXy!)
Posted by: Old Grouch at July 16, 2007 08:07 PM (4St3+)
help!
-Chuck
Posted by: ChuckAdkins at January 04, 2008 11:05 PM (PyW0p)
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at April 19, 2008 12:59 AM (R7LgM)
Also, can't find information on blogrolls, either.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at November 04, 2009 06:19 PM (UEEex)
32 queries taking 2.563 seconds, 103 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.